I don’t know so my answer is useless
<span>"Being, after some time of entertainment and gifts, dismissed, a while after he came again, and 5 more with him, and they brought again all the tools that were stolen away before, and made way for the coming of their great Sachem, called Massasoyt; who, about 4 or 5 days after, came with the chief of his friends and other attendance, with the aforesaid Squanto." I would say this sentence shows the Indians wanted to make peace by returning the stolen tools and bringing their chief to meet (the white Americans?) and having entertainment and gifts as well for the (white?) guests.</span>
According to the text, it can be inferred that the implicit message is that Leo is responsible for the destruction (option A).
<h3>What is the text about?</h3>
The text talks about the scene that Cecil found when entering his house and finding the wreckage that his pet Leo had made. All the sentences describe the shattered state of the place.
Based on the above, it can be inferred that the correct answer is option A. Leo is responsible for the destruction.
Note: The question is incomplete because the is some information missing. Here is the missing part:
Read the passage and then answer the question
Cecil came home to find the couch cushions gnawed on, a vase lying in pieces on the floor, and a hole dug a foot deep in what used to be his flower bed. In the middle of it all, Leo sat on his haunches with an innocent look on his face, his pink tongue hanging out as he panted without a care in the world. Cecil shook his head and sighed. Not again.
Which detail from the passage is most clearly implicit?
A. Leo is responsible for the destruction.
B. Cecil doesn't know who Leo is exactly.
C. Leo sat with an innocent look or his face.
D. Cecil found Leo in the hiddle of the mess.
Learn more about implicit message in: brainly.com/question/11333868
#SPJ1
Based on this excerpt, we can conclude that the narrator is from a different part of the country than the other characters.
The other characters obviously have a distinct uneducated accent and are not very sophisticated, as opposed to the narrator who speaks good and grammatically correct English. Thus we can conclude that they are not from the same part of the country, let alone the same town.
Look it up on google duh lolllllllllll
