ok first of all his name is not jesus jesus is zeus the messhiach in the sriptures is yahoshuwah there are many parts to what he said but the three parts of learning is read learn and live
False! Alexander Hamilton was the Secretary of Treasure. Thomas Jefferson was the Secretary of State.
Answer:
The repeal of the commitment to Missouri affected Kansas because it allowed for an open conflict between abolitionists and slaveholders.
Explanation:
The Missouri Compromise, also called the 1820 Commitments, was an agreement passed in 1820 between pro-slavery and pro-abolitionist groups in the United States of America, primarily involving the regulation of slave labor in the western territories.
In 1850, the Missouri Compromise goes into crisis. California wanted to enter the Union as a free state, but it was located south of the parallel of 36 ° 30 '- that is, between the slave states. The war seemed close, but then a new agreement emerged: California was admitted with a free state, the other free states were forced to repatriate fugitive slaves, and New Mexico and Utah gained bylaws of territories and not states, that is, without own laws against or in favor of slavery.
The definitive crisis of the Missouri Compromise occurred in 1854 with the Kansas-Nebraska bill, authored by Douglas Douglas of Ilhinóis. Douglas proposed the Organization of Kansas and Nebraska as territories with freedom of choice, by popular decision, between being or not slave state. And as I encouraged the occupation, Douglas suggested that the railroad, still under construction, cut off the two territories. Congress passed the propositions, nullifying the Missouri Compromise. The confrontation between free states and slave states became then open and declared.
Answer:
They had begun to question the cost of the Vietnam War.
Explanation:
By 1969, opposition to war had rose. American cities were the scenarios of mass rallies and marches for peace and a withdrawal from Vietnam. The public was worried about the high number of casualties and the economic costs of the war.
They did not see the purpose of fighting and were increasingly distrustful of the official version told by civilian and military officials, especially after the images of North Vietnam´s Tet Offensive of 1968 revealed chaos and uncertain perspectives of victory.
