1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
3241004551 [841]
3 years ago
13

Imagine that you flinch after seeing lightning because in previous instances the lightning is followed by thunder, which scared

you. in this scenario, lightning can be interpreted as being a(n) unconditioned stimulus. unconditioned response. conditioned stimulus. conditioned response. extinguished stimulus
Social Studies
1 answer:
Law Incorporation [45]3 years ago
6 0
I believe the answer is: <span>Conditioned Stimulus
</span><span>
Conditioned Stimulus refers to a situation when a previously neutral stimulus which overtime cause you to make an automatic response for that stimulus. 
</span>This happen when you're exposed to a certain trigger over and over again which make your body create a pre-determined response for that trigger
You might be interested in
based on what happens in julius caesar which statement best describes the effect of caesar refusing to take the crown?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

There are differing responses to this question, depending on which character provides the answer. Casca explains to Brutus and Cassius that, in the arena, Caesar refused the crown every time Antony offered it because each time he refused, the crowd responded uproariously. Casca observes that “he would fain have had it,” implying that Caesar’s refusal was, essentially, theater and that he was simply pandering to the crowd. On the other hand, Antony uses the same incident to reveal that Caesar refused the crown because he was not ambitious or power-hungry. However, it’s more likely that Caesar’s motivations were as Casca implies: Caesar theatrically refused the crown to further secure the hearts and minds of the people, and he fully intended to accept the crown when the senate officially offered it to him.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
______is a doctrine that says if a shareholder dominates a corporation and uses it for improper purposes, a court can disregard
AysviL [449]

Answer:

Piercing the corporate veil

Explanation:

This are the options that come with this question:

  • hiding behind the corporate skirt.
  • whistleblowing.
  • piercing the corporate veil.
  • limited liability.

This is an example of the doctrine of "piercing the corporate veil." This describes a situation in which the shareholders of a corporation can be held personally liable for the debts and liabilities of a corporation, according to a court. This is in contrast to common practice in corporations, which assumes that, if a corporation is sued, the shareholders cannot be brought into the lawsuit. "Piercing the corporate veil" usually occurs in the case of fraud, or in the case of egregious and willful activity that put corporate gain over the public good.

4 0
3 years ago
England was cutting off the United States' trade with other countries. This action is called:
RideAnS [48]

Answer:

Correct answer is interference.

Explanation:

Interference is the correct answer, because as the term itself says it refers to the policy of involvement of affairs of other, and it this case to interfere in the relations between Britain and other countries.

First option because it refers of the act when you are taking something away from someone.

Third and fourth option is not correct as this terms are not related in any way to interference in political affairs.

6 0
3 years ago
Many of the oil-rich countries in the Middle East are also rich in
xenn [34]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Middle east countries hold a lot of natural gas supply.

Ex Saudi Arabia hold 300+ Trillion in natural gasses, making it the 5th highest natural gas reserve in the world.

7 0
2 years ago
The similarities and difference between the religious traditions of the Hinduism and buddhism? please give me answer fast
oksano4ka [1.4K]
Buddhism and Hinduism both have their origins in India and Lord Buddha, the prophet of Buddhism, hailed from a Hindu family. In fact, Hindus even consider Lord Buddha to be a part of ‘dasavatar’ or ten reincarnations of Lord Vishnu. However, there are quite a few fundamental differences between both the religions.

Hinduism strongly believes in ‘Atman’ the soul and ‘Brahman’ the eternity of self. As per Buddhism, there is no concept of the self or I and salvation involved in realizing this concept.

Hindus worship several gods and goddesses. While Buddha did not deny the existence of any god, he preached that it is futile to search or seek something which an individual is not even aware of.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mexico is creating a stronger workforce by eliminating the competition?
    11·1 answer
  • Eighteen-year-old Rebecca was asked in a phone interview if she attends church at least twice a month. She said yes. Rebecca has
    15·1 answer
  • Indians’ use of the number _____ was an important concept that was developed alongside other cultures. A. zero B. one C. seven D
    14·1 answer
  • How did the French and Indian War contribute to Reynolds's downfall?
    6·2 answers
  • Cost and benefit in economic example
    13·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    5·2 answers
  • How did the caste system affect indian society?
    7·2 answers
  • Who invented the Braille system and for whom? Explain how it works?​
    5·1 answer
  • What are the two types of financial assistance that can be applied for after Grade 12 to study and briefly discuss them in your
    6·1 answer
  • A smaller ______ means a higher monetary multiplier and greater creation of checkable deposit money through loans.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!