Answer:
Statements 3 and 4 are accurate about the story
Explanation:
1. By definition, a public good is a good that, once provided, no one in a group can be excluded from enjoying. Therefore, in the context of the story, public good is "a world without climate change", a good that everyone in the world can enjoy. So statement 4 is accurate.
Statement 2 is inaccurate because Jane's Rolls-Royce Phantom is at her disposal. Her car use will prevent others from using it.
2. Free riding is the act of enjoying the benefits of a public good without bearing part of the burden of providing it. In the story, Jane would rather let others bear the burden of reducing overall carbon dioxide emissions than doing it herself. In other words, she would like to enjoy a world without climate change (a public good) without contributing to make it. So Jane is a free-rider and statement 3 is accurate.
3. A collective action problem is a situation where free riding threatens to prevent a group from providing a public good. In this story, Jane's free riding action does not threaten to prevent people from providing "a world without climate change" because "she knows that her own individual contribution, as large as it is, does not itself affect the climate". However, if everyone behaves like Jane, then the world would be affected by climate change. So statement 1 is inaccurate.
Answer:
Jonas' perspective differs from the community because he realizes that the joy and fun that can come from sledding and experiencing winter is something that the community had to give up.
Explanation:
I think this is fine the way you have it, any questions about just ask. :)♡
Hey Max
Answer:
nah, I don't thin so.
Explanation:
There are way too many stakeholders, like private bloggers and yooutubers. Too many would resort to just working for free to get news out to the public, even if it could diminish the quality of their research and production.
Both are composed of words organized in such a way to convey meaning. . Both follow the conventions of the craft.