Answer:
The assassination of archduke franz ferdinand of austria.
Explanation:
T'was wild. he was in his car and the peeps who murked him were all like babloow! and blew his head off, like it was crazy my brother.
It was the Beats movement in which these groups are primarily composed of artists and writers that continuously criticised the present condition of the American society using their influence in media. In addition to that, these group of authors comprises a literary movement exploring the post-World War II American culture.
Timur the lame (Tamerlame), a Turco-Mongol ruler of Persia, was nicknamed like this after the stick he needed after half of his body was paralyzed. The original name was "Timur-Lang" in Persian, which does mean "Timur the lame"
comment: thanks to SwagGirl for pointing out my mistake! I corrected it now:)
Answer:
No, Napoleon's rule definitely did not represent the fulfillment of the French Revolution ideals, because the French Revolution was a liberal revolution, in the sense that it sought the establishment of a new rule where personal liberties where respected, where people were equal before the law, and where the government was accountable to the people, and served the people.
Explanation:
Napoleon on the other hand, was simply a dictator. Perhaps a very skilled and smart dictator, but a dictator nonetheless. He was not accountable to the people, and could do with the country what he pleased. He got France involved in a series of wars (the Napoleonic Wars), imposed his dictatorial rule over most of Western Europe, and caused the dead of thousands of soldiers with his disastrous decision to invade Russia.
Napoleon was like a new monarch, and the French Revolution was so contrary to the monarchy that its leaders beheaded the last French King: Louis XVI. For all these reasons, Napoleon was the opposite to what the French Revolution sought.
I’m pretty sure it’s a republic
