Answer:
Below
Step-by-step explanation:
● f(x) = -2x + 3
● f (0) = -2 (0) +3 = 3
● f(-32) = -2(-32)+3 = 64 + 3 = 67
● f(10) = -2(10) +3 = -20 + 3 = -17
● f(-17) = -2(-17) + 3 = 34 + 3 = 37
● f(10) => -17
● f(-17) => 37
Answer:
7
4
Step-by-step explanation:
The <u>actual values</u> are shown on the given graph as <u>blue points</u>.
The <u>line of regression</u> is shown on the given graph as the <u>red line</u>.
From inspection of the graph, in the year 2000 the actual rainfall was 43 cm, shown by point (2000, 43). It appears that the regression line is at y = 50 when x is the year 2000.
⇒ Difference = 50 - 43 = 7 cm
<u>In 2000, the actual rainfall was </u><u>7</u><u> centimeters below what the model predicts</u>.
From inspection of the graph, in the year 2003 the actual rainfall was 44 cm, shown by point (2003, 40). It appears that the regression line is at y = 40 when x is the year 2003.
⇒ Difference = 44 - 40 = 4 cm
<u>In 2003, the actual rainfall was </u><u>4</u><u> centimeters above what the model predicts.</u>
The answer is 7 cm because you times 144 to 7 and you divide that answer by 7 and we get seven
Answer:
When dividing two fractions by each other, the result will be larger. Dividing two whole numbers, however, will always result in a smaller number because you're taking away a part of the number.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Deductible
Step-by-step explanation:
you pay the first $1,000 of covered services yourself
