Granting access to a user based upon how high up he is in an organization violates "the principle of least privileges."
As the principle of least privileges states that a person should be given only those privileges that are needed or are necessary to perform a specific job or task and nothing more.
The principle of least privileges states that you assign users the minimum set of privileges which they require to do their jobs, according to their roles.
The principle of least privilege prevents the spread of malware on your network. An administrator or superuser with access to a lot of other network resources and infrastructure could potentially end up spreading malware to all those other systems which he gets access to.
Hence, if the organization grants access to a user based upon how high up he is then the organization violates the principle of least privileges.
To learn more about the least privileges here:
brainly.com/question/27034248
#SPJ4
Answer: all money in circulation throughout the economy
Explanation: apex
Answer:
brand loyalty
Explanation:
Brand loyalty: The term "brand loyalty" is determined as the propensity of specific consumers to "continuously purchase" a particular brand's products over some other brand's products. However, a specific consumer's behavioral patterns are responsible for demonstrating that he or she will continue to purchase products from the same company that has been fostered a "trusting relationship".
In the question above, the given statement represents brand loyalty.
The D/E ratio indicates how much debt a company is using to finance its assets relative to the value of shareholders' equity
Answer:
that the statutes do not violate the state constitution or the us constitution.
Explanation:
State courts can remove laws from the bench. Think about what the supreme court does on a daily basis which is to review laws and determine if they are allowable under the constitution, think roe v wade, brown v board of education. state courts do this too. Think the recent texas abortion law. State courts have the responsibility to solve cases in a constitutional manner.
