Why was the "Gettysburg Address" so important?

History

2 answers:

katovenus [111]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Image result for Why was the "Gettysburg Address" so important?

In it, he invoked the principles of human equality contained in the Declaration of Independence and connected the sacrifices of the Civil War with the desire for “a new birth of freedom,” as well as the all-important preservation of the Union created in 1776 and its ideal of self-government.

Explanation:

hope it helps:)

Maslowich4 years ago

3 0

The Gettysburg address was important because of world war 1. Lincoln has to honor his fallen men from the war. He started with four score and 7 years ago which is how long ago the United States of America became the United States. But the importance of the Gettysburg address was that Lincoln invoked principles of basic human equality in the Declaration of Independence and connected the sacrifices of the men who fought in the civil war for a new birth of freedom. Hope this helps! Please mark as Brainliest!!

You might be interested in

Is drug use testing of students who participate in extracurricular activities permitted under the fourth amendment?

Sedaia [141]

Drug use testing for students who participate in extracurricular activities under the forth amendment is legal. In 1994, the supreme court made the decision that it was constitutional. This ruling was made as the supreme court found that students that participate in extracurricular activities had a lower expectation of privacy than the average individual.

3 0

3 years ago

Why did countries pay tribute to the us

Alex Ar [27]

Because the U.S supposedly helped other countries

8 0

3 years ago

What was the stamp act named for

Vadim26 [7]

Answer:

It was called the Stamp Act because the colonies were supposed to buy paper from Britain that had an official stamp on it that showed they had paid the tax. The French and Indian War was fought between the British American colonies and the French, who had allied with the American Indians. It lasted from 1754 to 1763.

8 0

2 years ago

How does the archon of ancient Greece relate to our government today?

kykrilka [37]

The principal magistrates in the Ancient Greece were the 9 archons, who formed a corps of 10 with the secretary of the tesmótetas. The principal archons were:

- The chief or eponymous archon: he was the visible head of the State and gave his name to the year. With executive functions within the civil life of the city, it was the highest authority unless it was at war or extraordinary situation. He presided over and organized the great Dionysians and had some judicial duties: he is responsible for judicial processes.

- The archon king (basileus): was the main religious official of the state and judicially understood in religious causes. Heir to the rituals of the kings, he is in charge of the Mysteries, of the public sacrifices in general, of the processions, of the January Dionysians. He is the president of the Areopagus.

- Archon polemarco: he was no longer military leader, but he understood in the judicial cases of non-citizens. The Polemarco organizes civic ceremonies in relation to the army.

- The 6 archbishops tesmótetas: they were in charge of judicial and legal functions. They were the magistrates in charge of transcribing and guarding the sentences issued by the judges. The six tesmotetas (or depositaries of the institutions) instruct the rest of the causes and lawsuits. In the fourth century they revise and coordinate annually the set of the legislated.

Lately there are many people that criticize the current form of democracy (government of the people) that is practiced in most of the Western countries, since it is very easy to become a demagogy. In a demagogy we seek to direct the people through propaganda and discourse, that is, to convince ourselves of what is best for us through words. The thing is that we do not have fallen into a demagogy at this time, but it is true that in our democracy there is a lot of demagogy. A lot is said and little is done, and when someone does something (some of those who rule) he is criticized for it.

The Greek philosopher Plato said that it is very easy for democracy to derive towards a demagogy, practically as easy as monarchy derives towards a tyranny. To avoid the deformations of the forms of government, he proposed a new form based on the education and training of the leaders, seeking to create a political class whose work and purpose in life was "to command" and for which they had been prepared for decades.

5 0

4 years ago

During the debate over the Constitution, which party argued for strong, independent states?

-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

The answer is D. the Anti-Federalist Party

Explanation:

They feared the authority of a single national government, upper-class dominance, inadequate separation of powers, and loss of immediate control over local affairs. Also, they opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. But, even though the Constitution was passed Anti-Federalist influence helped lead to the passage of the United States Bill of Rights.

7 0

3 years ago