All categories

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS QUESTION! I CANT FIGURE IT OUT, PLEASE HELP:/

Mathematics

1 answer:

8090 [49]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

i did something wrong since i have more than one answer

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

What is the value of x and y

Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

The answer is soooo simple

Step-by-step explanation:

its c

4 0

3 years ago

Choose all the functions that give the sequence:

TEA [102]

Hence, the functions that produce given sequence are:

f(n) = 2n + 1

f(n) = 2(n − 1) + 3

Further explanation:

We will put n=1,2,3,4,5 to find which functions give the given sequence

f(n) = 2n − 1

Putting values of n

$f(1)=2(1)-1=2-1=1\\f(2)=2(2)-1=4-1=3\\f(3)=2(3)-1=6-1=5$

This function doesn't generate the given sequence

f(n) = 2n + 1

Putting values of n

$f(1)=2(1)+1=2+1=3\\f(2)=2(2)+1=4+1=5\\f(3)=2(3)+1=6+1=7\\f(4)=2(4)+1=8+1=9\\f(5)=2(5)+1=10+1=11$

This function generates the given sequence.

f(n) = 2(n − 1) − 3

Putting values of n

$f(1) = 2(1 -1) -3=2(0)-3=0-3=-3\\f(2) = 2(2 -1) -3=2(1)-3=2-3=-1\\f(3) = 2(3-1) -3=2(2)-3=4-3=1$

This function doesn't generate the given sequence

f(n) = 2(n − 1) + 3

Putting values of n

$f(1) = 2(1 - 1) + 3=2(0)+3=0+3=3\\f(2) = 2(2 - 1) + 3=2(1)+3=2+3=5\\f(3) = 2(3 - 1) + 3=2(2)+3=4+3=7\\f(4) = 2(4 - 1) + 3=2(3)+3=6+3=9$

Hence, the functions that produce given sequence are:

f(n) = 2n + 1

f(n) = 2(n − 1) + 3

Keywords: Functions, Sequence

Learn more about functions at:

#LearnwithBrainly

8 0

3 years ago

Find two consecutive integers whose sum is 35

4vir4ik [10]

Two consecutive integers are 17+18

6 0

4 years ago

Solve for x, x^2-3x-5=0

Sophie [7]

Okay so for this one, we have to isolate our X.Lets start by moving the negative 5 on the other side of the equal sign. Remember to not mix a number that is with an X with a normal number (in this case it would be the -3x and the -5). So in putting our -5 on the other sign it becomes positive. Here’s what we have: x^2-3x=5. x^2 is the same thing as 2x.So now you have to minus 3x off of your 2x. This gives us -1x, but can just be put as -x. So now we have -x=5. You’re answer could either be 5 or -5 if you decided to divide it by -1 seeing as your -x is technically -1.

7 0

3 years ago

Aye seriously If some1 could help me with parallel line proof reasoning that would be awsome!!

valentina_108 [34]

I can't say from the picture, but are g and h normal to p and r?

5 0

3 years ago