Answer:
did u forget to add something or was this not meant to be a question
Answer: b) revolutinary, unlucky, ingenious.
Explanation:
Personally, I believe his luck fell bad throughout his lifetime but his work was still very revoluntionay to the country, as well as inventive (ingenious).
A. seems wrong because he wasn't seen as resourceful because of his luck. He also didn't seem selfish as his intentions weren't bad.
C. Seems wrong because I feel as if his "unluckiness" caused him to not be considered a businessman. I'm not sure about weather to consider him "perserverant" or not.
Logos: the statement relies on facts and reason to support a claim
1) a person or thing that announces or signals the approach of another.
2) a forerunner of something
Answer:
O Montresor is an unreliable narrator.
Explanation:
This passage is narrated in the first person. As we know, Montressor, the narrator, is an unbalanced man and crazy for revenge. In his conception Fortunato would never be able to understand what his plans were and why he acted the way he did, but we are not able to know if this is true, through the narration of Montressor.
As we only know his perception of what happens in history, we do not know what is real and what is invented, so we can say that he is not a reliable narrator.
