To the cause of Egyptians having mostly everything of gold then the Nubian
Although this is of course subjective, Humanism is generally thought to be a positive, "good" movement in that it takes the focus away from supernatural, unknowable powers and places it on humans themselves.
<u>Answer:
</u>
They can and do change cultural norms, values, symbols, and institutions, and the ability to contest this is known as agency.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The leaders involved in state domination are often seen to be seeking power through various means and forms.
- In order to have access to forms of power, people in such disciplines contest with each other and achieve the authority to exercise the power dispensed by the post.
- When such people secure power, they become the agents of change and often change things and ideas that are in prevalence.
Explanation:
Prithivi Narayan Shah as democratic King:
He initiated the invasion campaign which would eventually make a country called Nepal. Prithivi Narayan Shah is known as a democratic King in the history of the Shah Dynasty because he assumed that the people should have a proper role in the ruling of the state.
The answer is "the social-conflict approach".
The social conflict approach is a way to deal with social theory that contends that society is described by different disparities and clashes that reason individuals to act socially, delivering change.
Society, according to the social conflict approach, isn't amicable. It's not steady. Society doesn't create agreeable balance. Truth be told, it's overflowing with imbalance. So this methodology is extremely about investigating imbalances of race, class, sexual orientation, and ethnicity, and the social clashes which result. Basically, these contentions will result in change, changes that will move society.
