1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
UNO [17]
3 years ago
13

¿Por qué se dividió en virreinatos en América del Sur?

History
1 answer:
taurus [48]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Cuando Cristóbal Colón tocó tierra tras su travesía del Atlántico, en 1492, no imaginaba todavía que cambiaría el curso de la historia para siempre.

Tampoco pensaría que de allí a pocos años desencadenaría una lucha entre las dos mayores potencias económicas y militares de la época, España y Portugal, por hacerse con las riquezas de ese territorio aún desconocido para los europeos.

Dos años después, los Reyes Católicos, Isabel y Fernando, y el de Portugal, Juan II, llegaron a un compromiso y firmaron en Tordesillas (entonces Reino de Castilla) un pacto para repartirse las tierras "descubiertas y por descubrir" fuera de Europa.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How was the south different then the north before the Civil War
ruslelena [56]

The North was mainly an urban society in which people held jobs.

The South was primarily an agricultural society in which people lived in small villages and on farms and plantations.

Because of their cultural differences, people of the North and South found it difficult to agree on social and political issues.

The North was a manufacturing region, and its people favored tariffs that protected factory owners and workers from foreign competition.

Southerners opposed tariffs that would cause prices of manufactured goods to increase. Planters were also concerned that England might stop buying cotton from the South if tariffs were added.

While there were several differences between the North and the South, the issues related to slavery increasingly divided the nation and led to the Civil War.

A major conflict was states’ rights versus strong central government.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you think would have happened if Otto Esche’s ideas to use Bactrian Camels to transport salt would have worked out?
KatRina [158]

If Otto Esche’s idea to use Bactrian Camels to transport salt would have worked out, there would have been a mad rush to the British Columbia, Canada area. The economy for the province would have more than likely boomed, creating a wealthy area. Salt was a very expensive, yet useful commodity as it was used to preserve meats and cure leather. This made it invaluable during this time period. It could also help to sustain soldiers during war (circa Civil War).


6 0
2 years ago
What do you already know about the 9/11 terrorist attacks? What aspects of American life do you think were changed after the 9/1
KIM [24]

1) Four flights were hijacked. Two crashed into the World Trade Center towers, one crashed into the Pentagon, and one was going for an undisclosed target, but ended up crashing into a field in Pennsylvania. Over 2,000 lives were lost.

2) The War on Terrorism began which is still going on to this day. Airlines now have more security measures, the 24 hour news cycle began, and the Patriot Act was enacted.

3) First responders are dealing with mental and physical health issues from responding to the attacks. They have trauma from what they saw when responding, and have been getting illnesses like cancer from all the dust and asbestos at the attack sites. The death toll from the attacks is still rising due to this

3 0
2 years ago
The _____ did much to educate and provide jobs for newly freed slaves following the end of the Civil War.
FromTheMoon [43]
The 14th amendment did much to educate and provide jobs for newly freed slaves following the end of the civil war.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Supreme Court’s decision on California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians significant?
PSYCHO15rus [73]

The correct answer is A

California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians was a US Supreme Court landmark decision issued in 1987. It abolished laws which restricted gaming and gambling on Indian reservations. States desired to control gaming in reservations but this decision concluded that Indian gambling could only be restricted in states where all gaming activities were deemed criminal according to state law. It was considered unconstitutional, that the states tried to limit only certain type of gambling activities and not others.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I NEED HELPPPPPP<br> PLEASEEE
    6·1 answer
  • How did adam smith revolutionize economics
    5·1 answer
  • This document was negotiated between the United States and Great Britain in 1783. It ended the revolutionary war and recognized
    13·2 answers
  • How does Abraham Lincoln use The Gettysburg Address to shape society? He wants to strengthen patriotic ideals by reminding his a
    7·2 answers
  • In his address at Rice University what does Kennedy argue
    11·2 answers
  • An oasis can be described as a small __________. A. tropical desert B. tropical jungle C. area of land in the ocean D. area of w
    9·2 answers
  • The nazi party was also known as the nationalist socialist German worker's party. True or false?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these is a way that politicians in the United States attempt to influence the media?
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone pls explain the <br> Schlieffen Plan to me <br><br> It’s for a major grade
    5·1 answer
  • Voter suppression’s impact on U.S democracy
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!