<span>Hindus refer to the human desire for worldly achievement as Dharma.
In Hinduism, Dharma requires worldly thought that is really important to </span>“Renouncing this life” or “renouncing suffering” that is important to pass in order to fulfill <span>human desire for worldly achievement </span>
A. revise the Articles of Confederation
<span>The purpose of the Constitutional Convention that met in Philadelphia beginning on May 25, 1787 was to amend the Articles of Confederation. It had, by that time, become clear that the Articles of Confederation were not a good enough constitution for the new nation. The convention was called to improve on the Articles. However, the convention was not called to do what it ended up doing. What it ended up doing was creating an entirely new constitution. This new constitution gave the federal government much more power than it had had under the Articles of Confederation.</span>
I'm assuming you mean the French alliance with the American colonists during the American War for Independence against the British.
The French alliance was hugely important for two reasons:
- France provided significant military support, especially in leadership roles like that of General Lafayette, and in support provided by the French navy in battling British ships and transporting reinforcements for the American patriots.
- France devoted enormous financial aid to the Americans. The cost to France for supporting America’s revolution added up to 1 billion livres (about 4 billion in today’s dollars). That financial boost was much needed by the revolutionaries in America. [It did also have the side effect of putting the French government deeper in debt, which led to the French Revolution.]
Answer:
A. limited Government
Explanation:
The US Constitution defines the powers of each branch of government and its limitations. It also institute checks and balances to avoid abuses by one branch. The inclusion of an article that gives people the right to have a trial by jury is a measure of legal protection of citizens against the possibility of unfair trial; it imposes a limitation on the power of the judicial branch, on the power of judges. It is also justified historically; trials without a jury were one of the motives of deep disatisfaction of the American colonists under British royal rule.
The forest with the dinosaurs