Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option B) decrease.
Explanation:
Regressive tax is that of tax which is imposed in such manner that when the income level in the economy increases , the average tax rate would decrease. This type of tax has heavy burden on the low income people as it takes high proportion of their income. So it can be said here that there is an inverse relationship between tax payer's ability to pay ( which can be measured in income , assets or consumption) and the tax rates imposed.
Answer:
$8.78
Explanation:
National advertising made dividend payment of $0.75 per share
The dividend is expected to grow at a constant rate of 6.50%
= 6.50/100
= 0.065
The company beta is 1.85
The required return on the market is 10.50%
The risk free rate is 4.50%
The first step is to calculate the rate of return using the CAMP model
R = Risk free rate+beta(market return-risk free rate)
= 4.50%+1.85(10.50%-4.50%)
= 4.50%+1.85×6%
= 4.50%+11.1
= 15.6
Required rate of return= 15.6
Therefore the current stock price can be calculated as follows
Po= Do(1+g)/(r-g)
Where Do= 0.75, g= 0.065, r= 15.6
Po= 0.75(1+0.065)/(0.156-0.065)
Po= 0.75(1.065)/0.091
Po= 0.7987/0.091
Po= $8.78
Hence the company current stock price is $8.78
The equation for problem above is:
350.25+12/100*x=800.5
12/100*x=800.5-350.25
12/100*x=450.25
12x=45025
x=45025/12=3752.08
But the question is "at <span>least" $800.50 so the final answer is
</span>
<span>
</span>
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
Marginal Productivity can be described as when every variable in the equation is held constant, it is the amount of productivity gained for every extra hour of labor that is put in.
And according to the information about Joey and his productivity cutting the lawns, we are provided the equation q = 0.2*L which means that for every extra hour Joey works cutting the lawns, Joey's marginal productivity is going to decrease by 0.2 or 20% so the answer is B.
I hope this answer helps.
Answer:
$ 25
Explanation:
As per the description, the exact amount that is being contributed from the corn bushel to the Gross Domestic Product would be $ 25. The price at which the farmer sold it to the supermarket would not be included in the GDP because it would be considered as an intermediary good because the good purchased for the resale purpose is not included in GDP as it leads to double-counting. Thus, <u>only the price of the final good i.e. $ 25 would be included in GDP as it will now be used for final consumption by the customers</u>.
