Out of the choices provided above, it can be stated that all except the interpretation of data should be considered when designing a study. Therefore, the option B holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of interpretation of data?</h3>
Interpretation of data can be referred to or considered as a process of assuming or taking into consideration the intended meaning behind any form of data being expressed. This process is not involved in the step of designing of a study.
Therefore, the option B holds true and states regarding the significance of interpretation of data.
Learn more about interpretation of data here
brainly.com/question/25529708
#SPJ1
The question seems to be incomplete. It has been added below for better reference.
All of the following should be considered when designing a study except
A. the type of research method to use
B. how to interpret collected data
C. who the participants will be
D. the type of measurement
I have got to go to the park today.
I haven't got a chance to pick the roses.
Tim hasn't got time to play right now.
There you go! :)
Answer and Explanation:
The sentence shown in the question above represents an anecdote that shows how Euchner chose the witnesses for the trial. Accordingly, we can see that the criteria for this choice were not the best and do not present efficient reasons for it to be promoted. Accordingly, we can infer that Euchner did not have many options to choose from and that few people in the crowd were willing to testify.