I think its Less exspensive, because I have 4 music instruments, and ukulele was very cheap
Answer:
you need a period at the end
Explanation:
The dissenters in the flag-burning case and their supporters might at this juncture note an irony in my argument. My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of our self-conception and that commitment to it requires the rejection of official dogma. But how is that admittedly dogmatic belief different from any other dogma, such as the one inferring that freedom of expression stops at the border of the flag?
The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self-contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly at odds with our commitment to freedom of conscience. The controversy surrounding the flag-burning case makes the case well.
The controversy will rage precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to embrace a prohibiton on such communication, we would be saying that the 1st Amendment protects expression only when no one is offended. That would mean that this aspect of the 1st Amendment would be of virtually no consequence. It would protect a person only when no protection was needed. Thus, we do have one official dogma-each American may think and express anything he wants. The exception is expression that involves the risk of injury to others and the destruction of someone else`s property. Neither was present in this case.
Focusing on Passepartout’s perspective makes the story
objective. Passepartout doesn’t have a personal bias or have anything to prove
so he doesn't react impulsively or affectionately. (Greenleafable,
Brainly)“Being much less cool-headed than Mr. Fogg, he was
much more restless, counting and recounting the days passed over, uttering
maledictions when the train stopped, and accusing it of sluggishness, and
mentally blaming Mr. Fogg for not having bribed the engineer. The worthy fellow
was ignorant that, while it was possible by such means to hasten the rate of a
steamer, it could not be done on the railway.” This is a quote showing that the
narrator is telling the story from third person, not Passepartou from first, thus giving the story a more real and relatable aspect to it.
