Answer:
The history of civil rights in the twentieth-century United States is inseparable from the history of the Great Migration. From the end of World War I through the 1970s, extraordinary numbers of African Americans chose to leave the South with its pervasive system of legalized racism and move to cities in the North and West. While we often associate the Great Migration with the decades around the two World Wars, historians have recently established that many more people moved away from the South after 1940 than before. Between 1940 and 1980, five million African Americans moved to the urban North and West, more than twice the number associated with the first wave of migration from 1915 to 1940.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
To prevent a war in Germany but also to appease Hitler
Native-born Protestant Americans distrusted and resented Irish immigrants for all of the following reasons except that the Irish immigrants were very slow to learn American English and mostly spoke Gaelic in their urban neighborhoods.
These immigrants, who were sometimes referred to as "Scotch-Irish," were driven out of Ireland by religious disputes, a lack of political autonomy, and deplorable economic conditions. They were drawn to America by the prospect of land ownership and greater religious freedom.
Educated and talented workers made up a large portion of Scotch-Irish immigration. Irish immigrants arrived in significant numbers in the US in the 1840s, but because of their financial situation, they were unable to migrate west and purchase land, so they remained in coastal cities.
Irish immigrants were viewed with suspicion and resentment by native-born Protestant Americans since they were perceived to be excessive drinkers and were initially economically unsuccessful in assimilating into American society due to their poverty.
Furthermore, a network of parochial schools built by the Irish immigrants helped advance and promote Catholicism in America.
To learn more about the Irish Immigrants refer to:
brainly.com/question/3123351
#SPJ1
I think you forgot to add some details but based on my research, the correct answers are Rhode Island, Delaware, and Georgia. These states would probably oppose a system wherein the number of votes each state had in the nation's legislature will be based on the state's population. These states will oppose because they are less populous. Thank you for posting your question. I hope that this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.