Does separation implies inferiority?!

1 answer:

7 0

In a sense, yes.

Seperation, however it is used (even seperate but equal), implies that the group that created this law wishes that it is a more superior group, and that those who are more affected by the law are inferior. However, there are certain cases that separation does not mean inferiority, but in most cases (especially one's that affect the public & is part of history), yes it does.

You might be interested in

Which of the following is true of the scientific Revolution?

irakobra [83]

Answer:

Explanation:

conflicts between science and the the Church began

8 0

2 years ago

What was the main benefit of scientific management?

Tju [1.3M]

The answer you are looking for is the last one! It should be "It encouraged workers to create goods more quickly and efficiently."

Have a great day!

8 0

3 years ago

What were the new roles for women in the Civil War?

MakcuM [25]

Answer:The lives of women changed dramatically during the American Civil War. They played important roles both at home and on the battlefield. ... On the battlefield, women helped to supply the soldiers, provide medical care, and worked as spies. Some women even fought as soldiers.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Greek myths describe an early civilization that developed ______.

zepelin [54]

Answer:

Minoans

...............

4 0

2 years ago

What did the new jeffersonian republican do?

lana [24]

Answer:

Jefferson has been called "the most democratic of the Founding fathers". The Jeffersonians advocated a narrow interpretation of the Constitution's Article I provisions granting powers to the federal government. They strenuously opposed the Federalist Party, led by Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers