How does the change in the election process for U.S. senators exemplify the flexibility and enduring nature of the Constitution?
(1 point) a)the change occurred in response to pressure from many senators, who believed their political power would increase if they were elected directly by the people.
b)the change reflects how the amendment process allows for alterations to the Constitution when the times and the people's interests demand change.
c)the change reflects the judicial branch's shifting interpretation of the intentions of the Framers
d.the change reflects the fact that state legislators were far more informed than average citizens were in 1787 and shows how this ceased to be true with the rise of the media in the twentieth century.
The correct option is B. The change shows that the national constitution is flexible and open to amendments when the situations for such arise. Certain things can be added to the constitution when the need arise at the same time, something may be removed from it; it all depends on what is happening per time.
Political leaders, including President Kennedy initially opposed the March out of fear of violence. President eventually gave his approval but political leaders were not part of the program.
The modern concept of parliamentary government emerged in the Kingdom of Great Britain between 1707 and 1800 and its contemporary, the Parliamentary System in Sweden between 1721 and 1772.
