1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
den301095 [7]
4 years ago
12

Please help??? Hurry

History
2 answers:
Sergeeva-Olga [200]4 years ago
4 0

They were pull factors.

GREYUIT [131]4 years ago
4 0
They will pull factors
You might be interested in
Culture and society before the scientific revolution
Bad White [126]

Answer: Scientific revolution is a result of the spirit/psychology of renaissance but in contrast to renaissance scientific revolution took place almost exclusively in the northern Europe. Before scientific revolution European society and culture is still full of religious symbolism and faith in God but all that mixtured with spirit of renaissance (some very inventive spirits helped to revolutionize the world).

Explanation: In a renaissance there are still no scientific institutions, there is no unified paradigm. Renaissance is very creative period because there are many paradigms coexisting in a very small space. There is a great impact of Judaism and Arabian philosophy. Marsilio Ficino and Pico della Mirandola have big interest in Egypt and Hermes Trismegistos, there are new translations of some Plato´s dialogues etc etc. There is a lot of spirit in the air and not everything takes form (doctrine, dogma). Scientific revolutions is a movement in direction to institutionalized science and definition of science (Enlightenment).

4 0
3 years ago
What led to the breakup of the standard oil trust?
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Roosevelt was the reason for the oil trust breakup.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would you change/introduce in today’s society<br> Explain why
Volgvan

All Cultures are inherently predisposed to change and, at the same time, to resist change.  There are dynamic processes operating that encourage the acceptance of new ideas and things while there are others that encourage changeless stability.  It is likely that social and psychological chaos would result if there were not the conservative forces resisting change.

There are three general sources of influence or pressure that are responsible for both change and resistance to it:

1.   forces at work within a society

2. contact between societies

3. changes in the natural environment

Within a society, processes leading to change include invention and culture loss.  Inventions may be either technological or ideological.  The latter includes such things as the invention of algebra and calculus or the creation of a representative parliament as a replacement for rule by royal decree.  Technological inventions include new tools, energy sources, and transportation methods as well as more frivolous and ephemeral things such as style of dress and bodily adornment.

Culture loss is an inevitable result of old cultural patterns being replaced by new ones.  For instance, not many Americans today know how to care for a horse.  A century ago, this was common knowledge, except in a few large urban centers.  Since then, vehicles with internal combustion engines have replaced horses as our primary means of transportation and horse care knowledge lost its importance.  As a result, children are rarely taught these skills.  Instead, they are trained in the use of the new technologies of automobiles, televisions, stereos, cellular phones, computers, and iPods.

Within a society, processes that result in the resistance to change include habit and the integration of culture traits.  Older people, in particular, are often reticent to replace their comfortable, long familiar cultural patterns.  Habitual behavior provides emotional security in a threatening world of change.  Religion also often provides strong moral justification and support for maintaining traditional ways.  In the early 21st century, this is especially true of nations mostly guided by Islamic Law, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

7 0
3 years ago
Which best compares the attitudes of Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis about Fort Sumter? Lincoln was eager to fight at Fort S
shutvik [7]

The correct answer is "Lincoln did not want armed conflict at Fort Sumter, but Davis acted quickly to cripple Union forces".

Lincoln was certainly adamant about avoiding military confrontation over the Fort. <u>His aims were put in preserving the Union</u>, <u>which proved to be extremely hard as the conflicts were started by the sates that had separated or seceded</u>, as well as the first attacks on Fort Sumter.

Davis cared a lot less about preservation and just tried to find <u>the quickest and most effective way to mitigate the conflict</u>. He believed crippling the Union's army would make them leave as they would not have enough time to respond and they'd be at a great disadvantage.


Hope this helps!

4 0
4 years ago
After the war, George Washington
USPshnik [31]
He ran for political office
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why didnât the Bantu speakers migrate northward?
    11·1 answer
  • Why was industrial production slowed after 1930?
    7·1 answer
  • Who was ancient Iran earliest people?
    9·1 answer
  • Which excerpt from paragraphs 1 to 3 of Wilson’s "War Message to Congress" appeals most to the audience’s emotions?
    14·2 answers
  • Why was Mary Musgrove important to the settlement of Georgia?
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP IF U CAN!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Buddhism. a. Therevada-<br> b. Nanayana-
    9·1 answer
  • Plz help!<br> What factors led to the rise of totalitarian governments in Europe and Asia?
    8·1 answer
  • What did the Federalists feel was the greatest threat to the future of the United States?
    10·2 answers
  • What Was the Largest Contiguous Empire in History?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!