1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hichkok12 [17]
3 years ago
6

Because Congress was unable to stop Shays’s Rebellion and the Pennsylvania Mutiny, it feared the

History
2 answers:
anzhelika [568]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It is 1

Explanation:

gogolik [260]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:b

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What territory did the US take from spain after the spanish-american war
Vikki [24]
Representatives of Spain and the United States signed a peace treaty in Paris on December 10, 1898, which established the independence of Cuba, ceded Puerto Rico and Guam to the United States, and allowed the victorious power to purchase the Philippines Islands from Spain for $20 million.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what way was the Sherman Antitrust Act successful?
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

It allowed the government to break up the trust arrangement that the Standard Oil company had.

Explanation:

Approved July 2, 1890, The Sherman Anti-Trust Act was the first Federal act that outlawed monopolistic business practices.

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the first measure passed by the U.S. Congress to prohibit trusts. It was named for Senator John Sherman of Ohio, who was a chairman of the Senate finance committee and the Secretary of the Treasury under President Hayes. Several states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. The Sherman Antitrust Act was based on the constitutional power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. The Sherman Anti-Trust Act passed the Senate by a vote of 51–1 on April 8, 1890, and the House by a unanimous vote of 242–0 on June 20, 1890. President Benjamin Harrison signed the bill into law on July 2, 1890.

A trust was an arrangement by which stockholders in several companies transferred their shares to a single set of trustees. In exchange, the stockholders received a certificate entitling them to a specified share of the consolidated earnings of the jointly managed companies. The trusts came to dominate a number of major industries, destroying competition. For example, on January 2, 1882, the Standard Oil Trust was formed. Attorney Samuel Dodd of Standard Oil first had the idea of a trust. A board of trustees was set up, and all the Standard properties were placed in its hands. Every stockholder received 20 trust certificates for each share of Standard Oil stock. All the profits of the component companies were sent to the nine trustees, who determined the dividends. The nine trustees elected the directors and officers of all the component companies. This allowed the Standard Oil to function as a monopoly since the nine trustees ran all the component companies.

The Sherman Act authorized the Federal Government to institute proceedings against trusts in order to dissolve them. Any combination “in the form of trust or otherwise that was in restraint of trade or commerce among the several states, or with foreign nations” was declared illegal. Persons forming such combinations were subject to fines of $5,000 and a year in jail. Individuals and companies suffering losses because of trusts were permitted to sue in Federal court for triple damages. The Sherman Act was designed to restore competition but was loosely worded and failed to define such critical terms as “trust,” “combination,” “conspiracy,” and “monopoly.” Five years later, the Supreme Court dismantled the Sherman Act in United States v. E. C. Knight Company (1895). The Court ruled that the American Sugar Refining Company, one of the other defendants in the case, had not violated the law even though the company controlled about 98 percent of all sugar refining in the United States. The Court opinion reasoned that the company’s control of manufacture did not constitute a control of trade.

The Court’s ruling in E. C. Knight seemed to end any government regulation of trusts. In spite of this, during President Theodore Roosevelt’s “trust busting” campaigns at the turn of the century, the Sherman Act was used with considerable success. In 1904 the Court upheld the government’s suit to dissolve the Northern Securities Company in State of Minnesota v. Northern Securities Company. By 1911, President Taft had used the act against the Standard Oil Company and the American Tobacco Company. In the late 1990s, in another effort to ensure a competitive free market system, the Federal Government used the Sherman Act, then over 100 years old, against the giant Microsoft computer software company.

Resource Used:

https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=51

I hope this helps you in any shape or form.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Thirty years after the civil war the south became very rich, overwhelming agrarian and economically dependent true or false
REY [17]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

The states of south lost the war, who enriched was the north, becomes strongest militarist, while the south for long years, becomes slavery by north.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
8. How does a candidate win a state's electoral votes?
iogann1982 [59]

Answer: All states have varied numbers of electoral votes that go to either candidate depending on the state's vote. In most of the country's 50 states, electors are determined on a winner-take-all basis, which means that the candidate who wins the state's popular vote will also take all of its electoral votes.

7 0
3 years ago
How did American women who opposed the war demonstrate their opposition?
adoni [48]

Answer:

The answer is: They formed the Women's Peace Party

Explanation:

The American women demonstrated their opposition to<em> World War I </em>by forming the <em>Women's Peace Party (WPP).</em> This organization was established by Jane Addams,<em> an American social worker and activist.</em>

The members of this organization believed that "<em>women were the mother half of humanity"</em> and thus, they needed to do something to stop the war. They called for<em> arm control and its limitation,</em> <em>managing European conflict and striving to remove the causes of war (particularly, economic).</em>

Thus, this explains the answer.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The common use of poll taxes to inhibit black voters in the South was outlawed by the?:
    14·1 answer
  • What factor contributed to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II? (2 points)
    5·2 answers
  • The development of a farming culture among preColumbian Native American Indians helped ensure
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true about the United States in world war 2
    6·1 answer
  • What were some Economical Contributions to Society for Ancient Africa?<br> (Please answer ASAP) :)
    9·1 answer
  • Exit
    11·2 answers
  • The Persian word vizier means?
    13·1 answer
  • 10pts per person
    12·1 answer
  • 5 things you can do to stay on the path to success
    10·1 answer
  • Discussion Topic
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!