What caused the Jews to rebel against Syrian rule?

1 answer:

8 0

Probably the earliest problems between them were regional. In the later period of the Divided Monarchy (Israel and Judea) one of the strongest enemies of the Israelite monarchies was the Kingdom of Aram, which was a Secondary Power just as the Israelite monarchies were. (The Primary Powers were Egypt and the Mesopotamian Kingdoms - Assyria and Babylon.) The Bible records the story of Naaman, an Aramean general, who is healed by the Prophet Elisha. While the Biblical story does not mean that this actually happened, the way that the King of Israel reacts to Naaman's peaceful entry into Israel reflects the enmity between the Israelite monarchies and the Arameans. Most of their disputes were territorial and dealt with the areas in the eastern Galilee and the Quneitra region. These territorial disputes were directly related to the amount of power that each could exert over smaller regional allies such as the Phoenician States in Lebanon or the transjordanian kingdoms.

You might be interested in

Which transitional word or pharase is used to make time connection between two ideas

Karolina [17]

Answer:

nd, in addition to, furthermore, moreover, besides, than, too, also, both-and, another, equally important, first, second, etc., again, further, last, finally, not only-but also, as well as, in the second place, next, likewise, similarly, in fact, as a result, consequently, in the same way, for example,

7 0

3 years ago

Which is NOT a feature of ancient Indus cities?

Brums [2.3K]

Your best answer I think is A

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

BRAINLIESTTT ASAP! What Is the Beringian Theory?

ELEN [110]

Beringia was basically the uncovered floor of the Bering Ocean between and around Siberia and Alaska. History specialists theorize that our ancestors crossed the Bering Strait from Siberia into Alaska during the final Ice Age.

Please correct any mistakes in my answer!! :)

6 0

3 years ago

What does succumbed mean

Zolol [24]

Like crippled or to give in to something

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Document 1: Charles Lindbergh | Des Moines Speech | September 11, 1941

djverab [1.8K]

The thing which Charles Lindbergh was advocating in his speech is:

Neutrality

Based on the given speech, we can see that there is the argument made by the speaker in no uncertain terms about the need for the United States to remain neutral and not be drawn into a war which had nothing to do with them.

Furthermore, he believed that the British should not have declared war on Germany if they were not capable of fighting and winning the war without the inclusion of America.

He cited the rising unemployment, the economy, poverty rates which were all internal problems of America and they did not need to be persuaded or cajoled to join the war of Britain.

Read more about Charles Lindbergh here:

brainly.com/question/5853317

3 0

3 years ago