1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
postnew [5]
2 years ago
13

4. What does each group hope to change or stay the same in Saint Domingue?

History
1 answer:
IRINA_888 [86]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In the context of the history of slavery in the Americas, free people of color (French: gens de couleur libres; Spanish: gente de color libre) were people of mixed African, European, and sometimes Native American descent who were not enslaved. The term arose in the French colonies, including La Louisiane and settlements on Caribbean islands, such as Saint-Domingue (Haiti), St.Lucia, Dominica, Guadeloupe, and Martinique, where a distinct group of free people of color developed. Freed African slaves were included in the term affranchis, but historically they were considered as distinct from the free people of color. In these territories and major cities, particularly New Orleans, and those cities held by the Spanish, a substantial third class of primarily mixed-race, free people developed. These colonial societies classified mixed-race people in a variety of ways, generally related to visible features and to the proportion of African ancestry.[citation needed] Racial classifications were numerous in Latin America.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Full meaning of OPEC
krok68 [10]

Answer:

Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where did western Europe's Industrial Revolution begin?
alexgriva [62]
Europe's Industrial Revolution began in Britain.
6 0
2 years ago
Betty Friedan argued in The Feminine Mystique that suburban women:
sashaice [31]
The correct answer is : 

A. Were often unhappy as housewives.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are three reasons why Reconstruction failed to live up to its potential?
Nadya [2.5K]
<span>The three reasons why Reconstruction failed to live up to its potential are: 

1. There was a lack of unity in national government. 
This is because, Reconstruction happened after Americans' Civil War and some of the people in the government didn't like the idea of establishing this which caused the failures of bring the South America into the country, revive the economy and rebuild the broken landscape.

2. Not enough of the freedmen wanted to become free. Although Reconstruction wanted to infuse the freed slaves into the society, it did not successfully established. This was due to the rise of American organizations that made them feel insecure.

3. America could not overcome the issue of racism. 
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
How did the arms race affect the US foreign policy<br><br> PLEASE HELP!!
Bond [772]

Answer:

I hope it helps u.

Explanation:

Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.

Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.

Mark me as brainlist answer,

Have a nice day,

Thank you ☺

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pls help i don’t understand this I’m in 5th grade btw
    8·1 answer
  • What happened on kristallnacht
    7·2 answers
  • What effects did the English Civil War have on American history?
    12·2 answers
  • The 1944 Battle of Leyte Gulf was
    6·1 answer
  • What specifically was dr. martin luther king jr. speaking out against when he made this statement in 1958? “i could never adjust
    9·2 answers
  • How did the Act of union shape canada to where it is today?
    5·1 answer
  • Which outcome was MOST LIKELY to occur after the passage of this part of the act?
    15·2 answers
  • What consequences did Alexander’s reforms have on Russia?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes current Palestinians?
    7·2 answers
  • What made WWII so destructive?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!