Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
The awnser is A.)
I have done research and all ive seen is to get the court to file bankruptcy
Had to look for the options and here is my answer:
When we say Free-Market capitalism, this means that this kind of market system has their own individual decisions and are not controlled by the government. Therefore, the one that fits the blank above is this answer: <span>the right to freedom of competition. Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
Option (b) is correct.
Explanation:
Sale value of the merchandise = $74,900
Sales tax liability = $74,900 × (7% ÷ 107%)
= $4,900
Sale value prior to sales tax = $74,900 - $4,900
= $70,000
Sales tax @7% on $70,000 = $4,900
Hope the above calculation will clear the concept since the question clearly mention that
Calhoun Crockery sold merchandise; the total proceeds collected, including a 7% sales tax, amounted to $74,900.
This $74,900 includes 7% tax also it means that the collected proceed is 100% + 7% = 107%
which includes 7% tax liability.
