The independent variable is the temperature.
The study aims to assess how the temperature level affects another variable, that, in turn, will be the dependent variable: the mood of the participants. The aim of the study is to conclude whether it is possible or not to infer causality between those two, in other words, to see whether different levels of temperature (<em>the cause</em>), trigger the emergence of a certain type of mood <em>(the effect).</em>
Non of these are correct. Actually the Citizens would elect nearly all government officials in public elections. Granted Higher class citizens would have more sway in the elections but it was still left to the general public
If you view states as unitary actors, you assume competing national interest groups have to work to create a unitary national interest.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The unitary entertainer presumption treats states as a solitary element that attempts to boost national interest, extensively characterized. Hence, can find the political separation between the leaders and the citizens.
(Along these lines, "national interest" could mean the states are exceptionally big-hearten). While such cleavages surely exist, they will exist at the same time with the issues and so many problems
.
The political action committees are private organizations that are created to raise and distribute campaign money to candidates for political office. <span><span>is an organization that is registered in the Federal Election Commission and aims to raise money to elect or defeat a candidate. So, the right answer is D.</span>
</span>
Answer:
debunking
Explanation:
Debunking: In sociology, the term debunking was proposed by Peter Berger during 1963, and is referred to as the propensity of socio-logical consciousness.
Debunking represents the phenomenon that explains the sociological perspective in a way that it never takes a specific social world based on face value, in the absence of assuming the sociological perspective as it appears to be. Along with this, it offers judgment and nuances.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the process of debunking.
