States neutrality
According to Nicholas Agar, the
government may not dictate to parents the sort of children to design. Parents
on the other hand will only have a chance of improving the capacities of
children without prejudicing their life plans.
Answer: The advantage of the Revolutionary War is that Americans got independence. The disadvantage is that Britain lost their land.
It was a win for the US, a loss for Britain.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The most of the tribes had their own language and also their own kind of society. None of these ethnic groups were a nation, all of them were their own little community. Plus, religious n political ideals.
Explanation:
Also how they were living was different, from stone houses to tents, and their techniques and tools of hunting, fishing, and farming. Furthermore, the goods they used for trading with other tribes were different from the areas they were.
Answer:
The Answer Is D
Explanation:
"accept Parliament's limits on their power"
I think they didn’t really have a judgement about who owned the land but had different tribes of different people, the different tribes might’ve had controversy against each other but that isn’t exactly known. Conflicts over the use and ownership of Native lands are not new. Land has been at the center of virtually every significant interaction between Natives and non-Natives since the earliest days of European contact with the indigenous peoples of North America. By the 19th century, federal Indian land policies divided communal lands among individual tribal members in a proposed attempt to make them into farmers. The result instead was that struggling tribes were further dispossessed of their land. In recent decades, tribes, corporations, and the federal government have fought over control of Native land and resources in contentious protests and legal actions, including the Oak Flat, the San Francisco Peaks Controversy, and the Keystone XL pipeline
