Mr. Justice Jackson, dissenting. . . .
Much is said of the danger to liberty from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction. But a judicial construction of the due process clause that will sustain this order is a far more subtle blow to liberty than the promulgation of the order itself. A military order, however unconstitutional, is not apt to last longer than the military emergency. Even during that period a succeeding commander may revoke it all. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. . . . A military commander may overstep the bounds of constitutionality, and it is an incident. But if we review and approve, that passing incident becomes the doctrine of the Constitution. There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Court’s opinion in this case. . . .
yes i copy and pasted but this is your answer
He is the founder of the province of Pennsylvania.
Answer:
Desegregation in school
Explanation:
The flag change of 1956 occured in Georgia, and Massive resistance was a plan directed by U.S. Senator Harry F. Byrd Sr. of Virginia and his brother-in-law who was a leader in the Virginia General Assembly whose name was James M. Thomson of Alexandria with the aim of bringing together in Accord the leaders and the white politicians in Virginia inorder to bring about the formulation of a new state law and policies to curb the Desegregation of public schools.
The “massive resistance” agenda occur because the people believe it is a way of going against desegregation.
Answer:
No map
Explanation:
Upload the map and I will answer!
Democratic governments protect the basic civil liberties.
