Answer: hjgjftdtrsdetfrghyju
Explanation: hjgtfrdesdgtfhjuk
True - this is one hundred percent accurate. As the world and it’s people grow older and evolve, so do their ideas and interpretations.
Answer:
People have rightly pointed out that drug offenses account for a relatively small fraction of “the prison population” at any given time. While correct, that shouldn’t be used to dismiss “The War On Drugs”. The number of prison sentences issued on drug offenses exploded around 1985 and stayed elevated for at least a quarter-century, perhaps declining a bit in the last few years. That adds up to millions of “extra” drug terms and at least a large fraction of the growth in prison sentences and prison records over the “mass incarceration” period. (I think it’s at least plausible it’d be a majority of that growth if we could account for related charges, but even if it isn’t it’s nothing to dismiss.)
Explanation:
Because he said in a mildly motion, we can assume that he does not take the dog away because he is cruel, he simply has like a good excuse to not keep it. But, his imperative tone of saying „I know where it is going” gives us the idea of he is not as comprehensive with the dog and it creates a problem in the story. With this explained, we can assume the best answer is C.
