Answer:
Financial disadvantage from further processing = $(9)
Explanation:
<em>A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost. </em>
<em>Also note that all cost incurred up to the split-off point (the cost of crushing) are irrelevant to the decision to process further . </em>
$
Sales revenue after crushing 55
Sales revenue at the split-off point <u>81</u>
Additional sales revenue 26
Further processing cost <u> (35)</u>
Net income after further processing <u> (9)
</u>
Financial disadvantage from further processing = $(9)
<em>Kindly note that the allocated joint costs( cost of sugar and crushing) are irrelevant. This implies that whether or not the intermediate products are processed further the joint costs are irrelevant to the decision to process the beet juice further</em>.
E.) Opportunity cost is the cost associated with giving up one opportunity for the benefit earned by another.
This is a question for you. Which one would you choose? I don’t think there is a wrong answer.
Justin<span> obtained informed consent from the client in order to follow the full disclosure policy. In this policy, referral fee can only be given with the informed consent of the client (this is the party being referred by the </span>referrer<span>). The informed consent should be in writing in order to avoid complications in the future.</span>