The detail that supports part A is the sentence that shows that without advertising, people would not have free access to television, magazines, newspapers, and internet content.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The text shows that advertising is something irritating, but essential for the proper functioning of the media.
- That's because readers and viewers may see advertising as a problem, but it's through it that they have access to fun and important content.
- This is because advertising provides the necessary funding for books, magazines, internet content, newspapers, and television to remain free to the public.
- In this case, advertising can be a problem that encourages positive results.
Your question is incomplete as you have not shown part A that this question is related to.
However, from questions similar to yours, we can see that part A shows that the theme of the text is that some people find advertisements annoying, but they are the ones that provide the public with necessary services and information.
More information:
brainly.com/question/15727939?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Depending on the system chosen, a mayor may be the chief executive officer of the municipal government, may simply chair a multi-member governing body with little or no independent power, or may play a solely ceremonial role. Options for selection of a mayor include direct election by the public, or selection by an elected governing council or board.
Explanation:
Answer:
What does the use of an extended religious metaphor indicate about their feelings? When Romeo and Juliet first meet, they speak in a shared sonnet. A sonnet is a poem about love, so the fact that they speak in a shared sonnet when they first meet is significant because it represents the love between them.
Please? : brainliest?! :D
When he want to explain Sancho Panza how he see windmills and want to fight with them.
The US Supreme Court ruled against the state of Tennessee in Baker vs. Carr because <u>Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, keeping rural districts in power</u>. This implies the correct answer is B
Representation in the state legislature of Tennessee was determined by 1901 law. The 1901 law set the actual number of the legislature for all county. This law was later not in favor of urban areas because of the significant increase in population thereby resulted in underrepresentation.
<h2>Further Explanation</h2>
In order to resolve this issue, a mayor of Nashville, Baker brought a suit before the US Supreme Court, saying that the then-existing law on apportionment denied eligible voters of highly populated areas the equal protection of the law as rightly stated by the 14th amendments.
Although, the case was dismissed initially by a District Court saying it lacked jurisdiction and that baker’s claim was not legitimate.
The U.S district court described the case a merely “political questions” that cannot be appropriately resolved by a court.
Baker’s approached the Supreme Court and the ruling of the district was reversed.
The Supreme Court ruled against the state of Tennessee and this ruling compelled the state of Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself based on the numbers of people that reside in a district.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
- supreme court
- rural voters
- ruling
- US
- power
- state of Tennessee
- baker
- carr
