Manifest Destiny was a philosophy that considered the United States was divinely ordained, justifiable and inevitable to expand its borders.
This philosophy encouraged the convergence of social, economic, and political factors helped urge the speed of westward expansion in the 19th century. With the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 people were driven to the west, white settlers and proponents of expansion began to voice concerns over what they considered an obstacle to settlement - The American Indian tribes that lived there -. White settlers considered the lands east of the Mississippi River a great place to raise cattle, wheat, and cotton.
The convergence of Manifest Destiny and the need to expand was used to rationalize the removal of American Indians from their native homelands. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was signed into law and authorized the president to reserve land west of the Mississippi River and exchange it for Native American land to the east of the Mississippi.
The two reasons explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendment are:
- The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society
- The Court upheld the verdict of several politicians under the Espionage Act for making speeches opposing the war
<h3>What is first amendment?</h3>
The first amendment was made in the year 1791. It protects a lot of the civil rights which include: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and so on.
Since the first amendment protects the freedom of speech we can conclude by saying that the two reasons explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendment are:
- The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society
- The Court upheld the verdict of several politicians under the Espionage Act for making speeches opposing the war
Read more on first amendments here: brainly.com/question/325850
#SPJ1
1.A)through elections/ 2.C)South Africa/ 3.C)economic sanctions(POSSIBLY)
A common law system is the system of jurisprudence that is based on the doctrine of judicial precedent, principal under which the lower courts must follow the decisions of the higher courts, rather than on statutory laws.
