Answer:
Boris johnson is the answer to politics
Answer:
What message can I infer from the poem's details?
Explanation:
The word "theme" refers to the message or main idea of any work. It can be the lesson, topic, the main concern, or main subject that the writer wants to convey to the readers in his writing.
The <u>most helpful question when trying to identify the theme of a poem will be a question about the message that one can infer from the poem</u>. By asking about the message that the poem's details can provide, the reader can understand and know what the poem is talking about and what it wants to convey to the readers. This becomes or helps the readers get the gist of what the poem is talking about.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
D alliance because of process of elimination
Answer:
In impeachment proceedings, the House of Representatives charges an official of the federal government by approving, by majority vote, articles of impeachment. A committee of representatives, called “managers,” acts as prosecutors before the Senate.
Explanation:
The executive power has grown thanks to the social perception of international crisis. Additionally, this has caused the three branches of public power to weaken.
The central theme of the text is the transformation that the central executive power of the United States has had, influenced by different factors such as:
- Indochina War
- Watergate case
These events have caused the presidency of the United States to acquire more power to make decisions. One of the important aspects of this transformation is international politics because the influence of the international crisis made the executive branch grow in importance.
This deepened an internal crisis between the balance of powers, because the executive branch acquired more power in foreign affairs and this situation is being projected onto the national scene of the United States.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/17905949
Note: This question is missing because the text is missing.
In the last years presidential primacy, so indispensable to the political order, has turned into presidential supremacy. The constitutional Presidency—as events so apparently disparate as the Indochina War and the Watergate affair showed, has become the imperial Presidency and threatens to be the revolutionary Presidency. . . . The imperial Presidency was essentially the creation of foreign policy. A combination of doctrines and emotions—belief in the permanent and universal crisis, fear of communism, faith in the duty and right of the United States to intervene swiftly in every part of the world—had brought about the unprecedented centralization of decisions. Prolonged war in Vietnam strengthened the tendencies toward both centralization and exclusion. So the imperial Presidency grew at the expense of the constitutional order. Like the cowbird, it hatched its own eggs and pushed the others out of the nest. And, as it overwhelmed the traditional separation of powers in foreign affairs, it began to aspire toward an equivalent centralization of power in the domestic polity.
Learn more in:
