The answer is notice key words and details.
I infer that the stranger is suspicious i gues
I recall taking a test with that question in it , i believe they were giggling? when they heard her coming down the hallway, the answer would be giggling..
Answer:
The Dani's tribe language does not limit their color perception and understanding.
Explanation:
The Dani tribe only used and knew two color terms, which were black and white. Being that they had no knowledge of other colors in their language, Heider decided to test their ability to learn and recognize color. She showed them color chips for focal colors and non focal and tested them on well they remembered said colors. The test results showed that both the Dani tribe and English speakers struggled to learn non focal colors but had no trouble learning about focal colors. This showed that even language (the Dani tribe had no words for colors) does not affect negatively the understanding of focal colors.
Answer:
Even though this question is missing the options, after analyzing the revision we can safely say it was made for <u>conciseness</u>.
Explanation:
Conciseness can be simply defined as saying a lot in just a few words. Notice how the original paragraph is much longer than the revised one. The writer gave much more information than what was truly necessary. Details such as "and that new procedures need to be initiated" and "who was sympathetic" are superfluous. The first one adds nothing of value. If the procedures are inadequate, it is quite obvious that new ones need to be initiated. Readers could infer that. The second one is permeated with subjectivity, not only making the paragraph longer, but also stating an opinion that in uncalled for in this context. By eliminating the extra words, the writer made the paragraph concise, using fewer words to express the necessary.
