1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nexus9112 [7]
3 years ago
8

The Anti-Federalists believed in a loose, strict, or flexable interpretation of the Constitution?

History
2 answers:
Nesterboy [21]3 years ago
6 0

Federalists wanted a stronger national government whereas Anti-Federalists preferred that decision making powers should be with state and local government.  

Further Explanation:

Anti-Federalists felt that a strong government will be ruled just by wealthy people and they will steal power from common and poor class of people. They also had objection with the rights and anti-democratic elements which stated that President will be elected indirectly, there will be no age limit in respect to presidential term and also had issues with appointment of federal judges for lifetime.<u> Anti-Federalists were in favour of weak central government</u> because they equated a strong government with British Empire. They felt that the state governments were giving up too much of their powers to federal government. There another fear in respect to strong central government was that the lack of guarantees the then constitution gave in respect to individual rights. <u>The state which was strongly opposing a strong central government in United States was “North Carolina”</u>. This state comprised majorly of small scale workers and farmers who were self-reliant and independent and along with this, they were uneducated. They gave little attention as to what is going in other states or neighbouring countries.  The issue between Federalists and Anti-Federalists continued even when North Carolina joined the union. After some time, Anti-Federalists started calling themselves as ‘Republicans’ and under this name they won Presidential elections in year 1800.

Learn more:

  1. How did California differ from the United States in terms of interactions of whites and natives? <u>brainly.com/question/7248802</u>
  2. Which issue did the Supreme Court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana? <u>brainly.com/question/8891404</u>

Answer details:

Grade:High School

Subject: Politics

Chapter:History of Republicans

Keywords:

Federalists, Anti-Federalists, Republicans, Carolina, North Carolina, United States, Judges, Presidential Elections, British Empire, Democrats.

Phantasy [73]3 years ago
4 0

he Federalists also favored a LOOSE construction of the Constitution, believing that the Federal Government should possess all powers not specifically denied to it.

The Anti-Federalists wanted to limit the Federal government STRICTLY to the powers which the Constitution specifically delegated to it. In other words, they wanted to shackle the powers of the government and keep a tight control on it.

You might be interested in
what had been causing Benjamin Franklin troubles for far too long and he decided he had to do something about it?
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

His marriage was not joyful from the beginning, by contrasts in insight and aspiration with his wife and by its accentuation on practicality over affection or love; Franklin was a virtuoso and required independence from ordinary imperatives.

Explanation:

Franklin was an incredible man researcher, publisher, political theorist, diplomat. However, we can't comprehend him completely without thinking about why he treated his wife so pitifully toward the finish of her life. The appropriate response isn't basic. However, a nearby perusing of Franklin's letters and distributed works, and a reconsideration of occasions encompassing his marriage, proposes another and frightfully thunderous clarification. It includes their solitary child's deadly sickness and a contradiction over vaccination.

8 0
2 years ago
This officially ends Russia's involvement in the Great War allowing Germany to focus all its resources on the Western Front.​
dusya [7]

Answer:

On March 3, 1918, in the city of Brest-Litovsk, located in modern-day Belarus near the Polish border, Russia signed a treaty with the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria) ending its participation in World War I (1914-18)

3 0
3 years ago
What abandon fort became the Choctaw capital
Butoxors [25]

Answer:

The answer is Fort Towson

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Are there compelling reasons to believe certain values of democracy are threatened by what is happening in our politics today?
Nimfa-mama [501]

If we consider the speech of Barack Obama, when he leaves the presidency of the United States of America, we will believe that there is reason to believe that democracy is threatened.

According to Obama, there are currently 3 threats to democracy, the first of which are forces such as terrorism, increased inequality and demographic changes that threaten the country's security, solidarity and prosperity, but these same forces also threaten democracy . if opportunities are not created for all people in the country, division and dissatisfaction will only become clearer in the coming years, threatening democracy.

Obama also highlighted a second threat, which is the racial issue.  "So if we're going to be serious about the racial issue, then we need to maintain anti-discrimination laws - in hiring, housing, education, and the criminal justice system."  Said the former president who pointed out  that only laws will not suffice to resolve the racial issue. "Hearts must change. It will not be a change overnight." Social attitudes sometimes take generations to change".

Obama also mentioned a third threat to democracy, which is when a group of similar people joins a bubble, be it a community, a church, a social network or a college, and that group brings together similar people with the same political vision. One person never questions the other's hypotheses.





4 0
2 years ago
14
Colt1911 [192]

There are several reasons experts believe the city of Cahokia disappeared such as:

  • It grew too large
  • Sanitary system wasn't good and people got sick.
  • Inhabitants destroyed the nearby forests to get firewood and without the wood, their city couldn't survive.  
  • Enemies attacked.

Cahokia was a thriving city that was quite prosperous with their main food being maize which the fair climate allowed them to grow.

Overtime this changed and a drought that lasted for centuries kicked in. It led to conflict and strife in the large settlement as people could not get enough food.

Experts also believe that other problems such as poor sanitation systems and enemies attacking may have also contributed to the inhabitants leaving.

In conclusion, Cahokia was large and thriving but faced many challenges that in the end led to it collapsing.

<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/13269826. </em>

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Help me please need it for now
    8·1 answer
  • Which feature of Timbuktu helped make it a center of intellectual advantage and culture
    13·2 answers
  • president thomas jefferson approve the louisiana purchase in 1803 he and other demactic republicans and had no doughts about the
    12·1 answer
  • What caused great britain and france to declare war on germany in 1939?
    6·1 answer
  • 44.
    12·1 answer
  • List four animals that went from the Old World to the New World.
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think he allowed the Spanish to take over without a fight
    6·1 answer
  • HELP PLZ ASAP
    11·1 answer
  • For the mesopotamians, the afterworld was __________.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following most accurately describes the Southern colonies?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!