Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Answer:
How to Overcome Adversity in 4 Simple Steps
Step One: Define the Problem Clearly. What exactly is the problem?
Step Two: Determine the Worst Possible Outcome.
Step Three: Resolve to accept the worst, should it occur.
Step Four: Expect and Improve the Worst Case Scenario
However, when faced with challenges in your life, here are 7 tips I've learned to overcome obstacles:
Don't complain. People don't want to hear woe is me over and over again, especially if you do nothing about it. ...
Face it head on. ...
Stay positive. ...
Be realistic. ...
Don't try to out-do people. ...
Emotional side. ...
Break it down.
Hello, your answer would be C.
A and B don't even make sense so those are out and so that leaves C and D. Well he isn't talking about how we all need to think the same or anything, even though he says we are all equal thats a different thing altogether. So the best answer would be C, hope this helped!
Answer:it is important because the government wants to see who the people want as president and who they find goodness in
Explanation:
