Answer:
No option is correct:
- A. Larry offers Curly 1 ping-pong ball for 1/4 of a hat.
- B. Curly offers Larry 1 hat for 3 ping-pong balls.
- C. Curly offers Larry 1 hat for 4 ping-pong balls.
- D. Larry offers Curly 1 ping-pong ball for 1/3 hat.
In order for Curly to win and Larry lose, Curly must offer 1 hat in exchange for 6 or more ping-pong balls.
- Option A: Larry wins 1 ping-pong ball.
- Option B: Larry wins 2 ping-pong balls.
- Option C: Larry wins 3 ping-pong balls.
- Option D: Larry wins 0.13 of a hat.
Explanation:
Opportunity costs are the benefits lost or extra costs associated to choosing one investment or activity over another alternative.
In this case, Larry can either have 1 hat or 5 ping-pong balls. Curly can have 1 hat or 2 ping-pong balls.
Answer:
B) 574,000
Explanation:
Equipment book of Paar value on december 31/14 of $294,000.-
Add Kimmels equipment book value on december 31/14 of $190,00
Add original acquisition-date allocation to Kimmel´s equipment of ($400,000 - $272,000) = $128,000
Less Amortization of alloction ($128,000 / 10 years for 3 years) = (38,400)
Eqcuals consolidated equipment of $574,000
Answer: $615,872.50
Explanation:
The amount the National Health Center will receive is the sum of the future values, 3 years from now, of the annual payments of the fines.
Future value of $100,000 paid 1 year from today:
= 100,000 * (1 + 3.5%)²
= $107,122.50
Future value of $250,000 paid 2 years from now:
= 250,000 * (1 + 3.5%)
= $258,750
Future value of $250,000 paid 3 years from today:
= $250,000
Total is:
= 107,122.50 + 258,750 + 250,000
= $615,872.50
Answer:
b. the implied warranty of merchantability
Explanation:
Implied warranty of merchantability refers to an implied assurance, in every sales transaction that the seller's goods are safe and fit for intended purpose of usage.
It represents an unspoken guarantee on the part of the seller that his goods conform to the acceptable standards and properly packaged and labeled and abide by the promises conveyed on their label.
The motive behind such a warranty being, the seller must properly inspect and test the quality of his goods before releasing them or making them available for sale in the market.
In the given case, the seller sold skis to the customer which cracked into two upon usage. The seller isn't aware of the cause of the consequence. Thus, the seller breached the principle of implied warranty of merchantabilty as per which, it should've first checked and inspected the skis before making them available for sale.
Answer:
<u>Monopolistic Competition:</u>
4. a firm that faces a downward sloping demand curve.
<u>Perfect Competition:</u>
1. a firm that produces with excess capacity in
3. a firm that may earn in an economy profit or loss in the short run
5. a firm that that maximizes profits profit in the long by producing where MR = MC
<u>Both:</u>
2. a firm that has a firm that sets price greater than marginal cost.
Explanation: