1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ne4ueva [31]
3 years ago
12

In 1841, the British government Select one: a. supported the rights and freedom of mutinous slaves on the Creole. b. seized the

Creole because it carried slaves. c. briefly declared war on American shipping in response to the Creole mutiny. d. refused to trade with American shipping companies that carried slaves. e. returned mutinous slaves from the Creole to Virginia, at the request of President Tyler.
History
1 answer:
maxonik [38]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The correct answer is A.

supported the rights and freedom of mutinous slaves on the Creole

You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from "Object Lesson, Part 2." "But this morning's little job," Ellery turned suddenly to the red-haired boy, "y
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

It created an uncomfortable situation for Joey.

Explanation:

I did the test

6 0
4 years ago
how did the regents of the university of California v. Bakke Supreme court decision affect affirmative action programs in the un
Nastasia [14]

The correct answer is: "US Supreme Court decision <u>supported </u>affirmative action programs".

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, was a case discussed by the US Supreme Court which led to the enactment of a landmark decision in 1978.

The decision supported affirmative action because it allowed race to be one of the criteria used in college admission mechanisms. However, it outlawed the usage of specific racial quotas (for example, reserving 25% seats to certain minority group).

4 0
4 years ago
Is the person who brings suit?<br> a. Defendant<br> b. Plaintiff<br> c. Attorney<br> d. Harry Stone
AveGali [126]
Defendant


hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Under the Articles of Confederation, why didn't the federal government enforce the laws?
satela [25.4K]
I believe the answer is there was no executive branch of government. 

The difference between a federation and a confederation, is that in a confederation, it is more of loosely tied together states that can leave at any time. Just look at the EU with Brexit. The UK is exercising it's right to leave. In an example of a federation, look at the US. The states aren't allowed to claim independence because it is against the laws. It's also tied together under a firm federal center. 
8 0
4 years ago
What are the basis for the US constitution.
saw5 [17]

Answer:

The basis for the US constitution was that we didn't want taxes but its the only reason the US is here.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement represents-75
    12·1 answer
  • Why is there controversy among historians on the issue about the civil war
    10·1 answer
  • Anyone know the answer ????
    11·2 answers
  • What actions did the pilgrims take to survive the struggles they faced
    14·1 answer
  • The "dragon robe" is an example of textile art from the late Ming Dynasty. True False
    14·2 answers
  • What point is Alexander Hamilton making?
    7·2 answers
  • Religion was important to early farmers because people believed
    6·1 answer
  • A. Identify the constitutional provision that is common in both Milliken v. Bradley (1974) and Brown v. Board of Education, I (1
    14·1 answer
  • How did Themistocles trick Xerxes into entering the waters of Salamis?
    10·1 answer
  • What common factor influenced the creation of both the Freedmen's Bureau and the Ku Klux Klan?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!