Well, the diction being used here is very elementary. For example, the use of colors and the correlated feelings to these colors might imply that it is for a younger audience. This alone is sufficient evidence to say that this story should be read to young children. Also, if you ever wonder what audience might like to hear this, imagine yourself reading this story to a room full of teach test group, then ask yourself: "which group would enjoy this story more?"
Answer:
Nope, the correct answer is B) with a historical example
Explanation:
I just took the test on edge.
Please make me the Brainliest answer!
Post hoc: fallacy in logic that assumes a cause-and-effect relationship because of sequence.
<em>Post hoc </em>is a fallacy since it implies that one event is the consequence of a previous event just because it comes later. Usually, if one event is after another, it does not mean one event is the cause or consequence of another just because they are correlative in time.
Inferences: reasoning from several particular examples to establish a general principle.
<em>Inference </em>means reaching a conclusion based on evidence.
Inductive reasoning: drawing conclusions from implied information.
<em>Inductive reasoning </em>uses data or information given to reach a general conclusion. it goes from specific to general.
Deductive reasoning: drawing a particular conclusion from general premises.
<em>Deductive reasoning</em> approach is based on a general statement or theory in order to reach a logical conclusion.