Answer:
The reaction of the older European men about the killing of the elephant was that A. They agree with the narrator that it needed to be killed
Explanation:
The narrator killed the elephant to do what people were expecting him to do as a police officer, he says in the last lines " he shot the elephant because he didn't want to look like a fool", despite the fact that he hesitated about killing him before he did and he also mentions the respect he felt for majestic big animals like that one, older European men agreed that the animal needed to be killed because they considered that image matters and that was the action that a police officer was supposed to take.
Answer:
there is no choices
Explanation:
what r the choices- tell me on comments
I would have to say the number 4... Because in a speech you have what you are talking about then you have the main reason and then you have a plan to solve it....I don't know if that makes sense to you but if it don't just comment and i will explain it a little better
Hello. You did not inform the play to which this question is referring, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
The stage directions allow you to make inferences about the characters because they show how a character should act and what emotion he must pass in his movements and lines. This is because it is the stage directions that inform if the character is nervous, kind, evasive, violent, among other things. In this case, to infer something about Christopher and Lizzie, you must analyze what kind of emotion the stage directions display about them.
I think the answer is A, the harsh and powerful reality of war.
