Answer:
In each succeeding payment on an installment note:
d. The amount that goes to decreasing the carrying value of the note increases.
Explanation:
- The option a is incorrect as the amount paid for both interest and principal don't increase proportionately.
- The option b is also incorrect as the the amount that goes to decreasing the carrying value of the note is not remain unchanged rather this values increases.
- The option c is also incorrect as the amount that goes to decreasing the carrying value of the note not decreases rather it increases.
I do have to be one of the most people in my class and I’m sure I will have a lot to say bye to you and your family love bye love you bye bye love bye baby love you bye bye love you too bye bye love you bye bye love bye baby love bye love you bye bye love bye bye
Among the options provided, the one that answers the question is letter B: "It meant people didn't have to give up their old gods when converting to Hinduism".
1. The northern states in the past relied on manufacturing (such as textile production and automobile production) as their main source of economic income.
The southern states on the other hand relied on agriculture (such as corn, cotton, and wheat) as their main source income
2/ They both the same in the term of economic system that they implemented. Both northern and southern states operated with Free-market/Capitalist system, where the economic benefit would be rewarded the most to someone who read the demand of the market and posses the capital to make it.
3. Factors that caused the different:
- The climate in southern states is typically warmer compared to the northern states, which provides the perfect environment for many plants to grow.
- The industrial revolution in united states centered mostly on northern states, so the invention of machines for efficient manufacturing exist mostly on the northern states while the southerns states still rely on slavery.
The answer to this question is <span>not admitted as evidence because it is hearsay.
Hearsay is the type of court evidence that is inadmissible because it deemed as something that less reliable.
In this case, there is no way the court could now/prove whether he's telling the truth or not because all of his statement is based on his individual recollection.</span>
