Answer:
triangular trade
Explanation:
For the British slave traders it was a three-legged journey called the 'triangular trade': West African slaves were exchanged for trade goods such as brandy and guns. Slaves were then taken via the 'Middle Passage' across the Atlantic for sale in the West Indies and North America.
Answer:
The revenue should not be recognized because of the unusual and subjective terms under which the buyer has the right to return the product.
Explanation:
If a buyer of goods has the right to return a product, the transaction is considered a sale with a right of return. When regular sales are made under these terms and there is a reasonable basis for estimating returns, revenue from the sale ought to be recognized and an allowance for returnsshould be established.
However, when the rate of returns cannot be reasonably estimated, revenue is not recognized until the right of return expires. Even though the goods were shipped in 2015, until the buyer accepts the goods or the right to return them expires, revenue would not be recognized.
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
It was smarter and more tactical instead of facing them head on and he won when he went through the Alps
