The amount of $25.00 billion will be the private investment spending that each $10 billion increase in government spending will crowd out.
<h3>What is the explanation on government expenditure?</h3>
When the government expenditure increased by $1 billion, the planned investment expenditure will falls by $0.20 billion., hence, for each $1 billion increase in government spending, there is a net change in intial spending of $0.2 billion
Also, the aggregate demand curve will shift to the right by the net change in spending multiplied by the multiplier, which equals 1- MPC.
Hence, the net increase in AD due to the $1 billion increase in government expenditure is equals what is known as the net multiplier.
Therefore, the amount of $25.00 billion will be the private investment spending that each $10 billion increase in government spending will crowd out.
Read more about government expenditure
<em>brainly.com/question/14786578</em>
#SPJ1
The law of demand implies that consumers will, all other things unchanged, buy more at lower prices.
One of the most fundamental ideas in economics is the law of demand. The law of demand explains how market economies distribute resources and set the prices of goods and services that we see in daily transactions by combining the law of supply. According to the law of demand, the quantity bought varies inversely with the price. In other words, the quantity demanded decreases as the price increases. Because of declining marginal utility, this happens. In other words, consumers utilise the initial units of an economic good they buy to fulfil their most pressing requirements first, and they use the subsequent units to fulfil progressively lower-valued goals.
Learn more about the law of demand here:
brainly.com/question/10782448
#SPJ4
Answer no 1
Bringing down the estimate for far fetched accounts makes the benefit bigger by paying off Bad Debt Expense and makes the Balance Sheet look better by exaggerating Assets. Since the contra-resource Allowance for Doubtful Accounts would be downplayed.
Answer no 2
This activity of change the stipends for far fetched accounts isn't inside the rights and zone of control of a director and is a moral infringement. No chief ought to have the option to transform anything inside the bookkeeping capacity. A supervisor ought to deal with the business, not the accounting for that business.
Globalisation is the growing interconnectivity of the world through the use of trade, travel and media.
Answer:
the amount of the impairment loss is $50,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of the impairment loss is shown below:
Impairment loss = Purchase price of trade marks - Estimated fair value
= $70,000 - $20,000
= $50,000
Hence, the amount of the impairment loss is $50,000
The same should be considered and relevant
