Considering the assertions made by Peter N. Stearns, the reasons he provided in defense of his
assertion that history is useful in the world of work includes "<u>studying history leads to the good upbringing of businesspeople, professionals, and political leaders.</u><u>"</u>
<h3>Some other reasons Peter N. Stearns provided are:</h3>
- Student history helps build people in professions like law and public administration.
- It helps in analysis skills.
- It improves the proficiency to find and analyze sources of information.
- Studying history helps to recognize and assess diverse interpretations, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are various reasons Peter N. Stearns, gave on how history is useful in the world of work.
Learn more about the benefits of History here: brainly.com/question/2875725
The correct answer is A) The employment rate of a nation also has social consequences.
<em>The statement that is supported by the information of the test is “The employment rate of a nation also has social consequences.”
</em>
The text is referring to the fall in formal sector employment and the social consequences it has for citizens. The example the text is using is the case of Czech Republic between 1985-1997. The text makes reference that the decline in employment has disproportionally affected women, but they are not the only case because it refers too the men decline employment. The employment rate of a nation has social consequences such as the decline of individual and family income, social exclusion, and a worsening of the life chances of their children.
Explanation:
Just say, "No more slavery." Boom. Problem solved.
Yes, it is true that linguists do not know for certain how language was developed by early humans, but they're able to determine that it started somewhere in Africa, due to human migration patterns.
By 1812, Spain was added to Napoleon's Empire.
