I think that This is correct, the very reason for English settlers
coming to U.S is haphazard. They came here in search for religious
freedom from the British crown, and forced there way onto America. From
then on they have used the land, gotten sick and died, searched for
treasure destroyed the land and fought with Indians. The situations that
brought them to settle in America and their dissensions afterwords set
the building blocks for an extremely haphazard way of life. They killed
many Indians made treaties and broke them, mined the earth for oil and
made war with Brittan 2 times. Also their greed for money and
industrialization was also out of control. All in all the settlements of
early America, was forced due to oppression and was never gilded into a
thoughtful manner.
All this needs is specific detail which i can't do since i don't have your book or curriculum.
Answer:
If I were to add something that would make my argument against slavery more convincing I would probably say something like what is the roles were switched, would you want to be a slave?
When people went to Africa or when they bought slaves they would often say something like it was in the bible and because of this that it was okay when this was not true so you could possibly use that to help your argument against it. There are probably better answers out there but I wrote a argument against slavery once and I used this stuff in and got a pretty good grade.
D. a foreign policy stance that espouses a unilateral approach to protecting the best interests of the United States.
This sort of policy agenda was part of the "neoconservative" view of a number of President George W. Bush's advisers -- especially some who had also served in the administration of his father, President George H.W. Bush. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, there was a desire to push American values and not be shy about doing so with the use of American military might. Sometimes referred to as the "Bush Doctrine," the core ideas were that the United States could pursue this goals on its own (without need for United Nations partnerships), that preemptive strikes were allowable against countries that harbored terrorists, and that regime change for the sake of promoting democracy was a good strategy.
The difference between the second and first generation of
Indochinese immigrants is they refuse the French culture. The
correct answer between all the choices given is the second choice. I am hoping
that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in
your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.
The correct answer here is B. The supplies they have are severely depleted thanks to the vandals that have destroyed not only their homes but also all of the provisions they had in stock. They are trying to feed the remaining population, 7000 of them, by rationing food from the single barn that was not destroyed.
