Answer:
your answer is on Wikipedia
Answer:
b. Revulsion alone at someone else's action is not sufficient evidence that it is harmful or immoral.
Explanation:
Hello! A type of food does not become immoral for someone's tastes, even if it disgusts you and you personally choose not to eat it because it’s not your type of dish, it is not an opinion that transforms food directly into something prohibited or charged with negative connotation, since it is something subjective that does not influence a culture.
King george, queen whatever, and the spanish dictators, and the tsar
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "HOPA of 1995
".
Explanation:
- HOPA, approved by President Clinton dated on 28 December 1995, revised accommodation for either the disabled to be removed from exclusion on the marital background.
- This included the implementation of identity verification protocols by the services or groups requesting the exclusion.
Therefore, it's the right answer.
