Answer: i´m pretty sure its ¨is informal and subjective¨ (B)
Explanation: this is the answer from quizlet
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
Answer:
<em><u>It caused people to question the role of government, which sparked the imagination of Enlightenment thinkers.</u></em>
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 established minimum wages and abolished child labor in the US.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- Due to the oppressive nature of work in the US, President Roosevelt during his term from 1933 to 1945 tried to improve working conditions and also to abolish child labor.
- As a result, the Fair Labor Standards Act came into enactment in 1938.
- It established minimum wages for the workers (25 cents), reduced minimum age to be employed to 16 and maximum possible hours of work to 44. This was to be reduced further in the coming years.
- It succeeded in improving working conditions and also in abolishing child labor.
