By 2020, however, there will be a significant change that will make DNA fingerprinting obsolete. The handful of markers used in
DNA fingerprinting will give way to the infinitely more sophisticated personalized DNA sequences. Fingerprints may give us a match, but DNA may tell us what the person looked like and give us his or her medical history. For example, by examining a single cell from a person’s dandruff, it is in principle possible (using the polymerase chain reaction process) to reconstruct the entire genome of an individual. Possessing the personalized DNA sequence, one can reconstruct important details of the person, including blood type, eye and hair color, sex, genetic diseases, general body shape, medical status, disposition to baldness, approximate height and weight, even body chemistry.
–Visions, Michio Kaku
Choose the best summary of these two passages.
DNA sequencing will replace fingerprinting because it will give scientists more detailed and useful information about people.
DNA sequencing will improve fingerprinting technologies because it will provide specific information linked to fingerprints.
DNA sequencing will bring significant changes to human genomes because it will cause people to rely on fingerprinting.
DNA sequencing will replace fingerprinting because it will give scientists more detailed and useful information about people.
Explanation:
The other options do not match what the passage was talking about. The article says this new technology will make fingerprinting obsolete, so there won't be a need for it anymore.
Emitting visible light as a result of the excitation of phosphors by ultraviolet photons produced by the passage of an electrical current through an inert gas infused with mercury” is the definition of florescent.
Florescent makes visible light through fluorescence. Fluorescence simply deals with how light is emitted through a substance which has absorbed light.
If you see, it says "writing, painting, and film editing", all in present tense and in the same structure. It means the repetition of a chosen grammatical form within a sentence.
a. Swift maintains that, if asked, people who have lived in poverty their entire lives would say that they would rather have been sold for food at one year of age.
