A series of trading outposts were erected along the Hudson River in what is now the state of New France in order to take advantage of the profitable fur trade that existed in the region around this colony. Option D, New France is correct
<h3>Where exactly did the trade stations make their home?</h3>
The regions that would eventually become New France were home to establishment of commercial establishments.
These territories comprised the lands in the Great Lake region that were also known as the Upper Country at the time. These regions were located in the United States.
Trading outposts: An institution that served as a venue for the buying and selling of products and services was referred to variously as a trading post, business station, trading house, or factory.
In addition to that, we added the regions including the Mississippi River, Louisiana, and the Gulf Coast. Consequently, New France was the location of the establishment of commercial stations.
Discover more about New France by reading here:
brainly.com/question/7869613
#SPJ1
B. The government should respect its citizens.
d. The government should teach its citizens how to become rich businessmen and productive contributors to society.
Tariff type of tax was implemented by country Q
Explanation:
Tariff is the tax levied by one republic nation on the goods brought in from another country. There are two types of tariffs which are specific and add valorem tariffs. It is best for raising the revenue of the country form imports but it results in high consumer price of the products which are imported.
When a country imports the specific goods, then the internal indigenous industries which produce the similar goods may lose their value by reducing the competition.
In olden days cross border trade was viewed to be the zero game where one can total wealth out of tariffs or other country could face total loss. There are also many instances in past which created rivalry between countries due to increase in tariffs that restricted imports.
<span>How did the Russians defeat both Hitler and Napoleon?
</span>
<span>First
off, they started pretty well. When the Germans first invaded, the
people thought they were being liberated (tells you a lot about the
government at the time) and were treated pretty well. But then they
started killing people and things went downhill. Now, Hitler had this
grand idea to take over Stalingrad (mostly for its namesake, Stalin). He
thought it would be a massive blow to the Russian morale. But instead
of basing his military strageties on logic, he did on feelings (he
wanted to beat Stalin); which is never a good thing. Unforunately, he
didn't anticipate Russian winter (which, luckily for the Russians, came
early that year and ironically the same year for Napoleon). So the
German army was stuck in Summer gear, rather then the proper Winter gear
(which was promised but never came through). AND look at Russia as a
whole: It's a huge country (I heard it takes around 8-10 days to just
get through Russia straight across). Now, to the other guy above me.
Russia isn't known for having the strongest armies ever. Actually,
compared to the Germans they were undisclipined, untrained and from all
types of backgrounds, and all ages, etc. Hardly sounds like an ideal
army. But the Russian people were stubborn and burned everything, so in
that way the German army failed. Plus, Russia had an endless supply of
men. Hitler was shocked to notice, there was always a fresh supply of
men waiting to fight.
So in conclusion, Russia's massive land(s) and brutal winters
contributed to both the fails of Napoleon and Hitler's conquer of
Russia. </span>
