1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kay [80]
3 years ago
6

What were the founding fathers willing to risk to declare independence?

History
1 answer:
Andrei [34K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

When you think of the Fourth of July, what words come to mind?

Holiday? Grilling? Fireworks?

But 238 years ago, it was a different three words.

Conviction. Courage. Sacrifice.

On July 4, 1776, 56 men met in Philadelphia to pass a resolution declaring their independence from England. It was anything but a picnic. What they did that day at Independence Hall would cost them greatly in the years to come. But it paved the way for a radical new way of thinking about government that would change the course of human history.

It’s not that the signers of the Declaration of Independence were against celebration. In fact, two days earlier, when 12 of the colonies had ratified the document, one of its architects penned a letter to his wife, predicting that the Second of July would be celebrated every year thereafter.

The second day of July, 1776, will be memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations, as the great Anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the day of deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp, shews, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations, from one end of the continent to the other, from this time forward forever.

You will think me transported with enthusiasm; but I am not. I am well aware of the toil, and blood, and treasure, that it will cost us to maintain this declaration, and support and defend these states. Yet, through all the gloom, I can see the rays of light and glory; I can see that the end is more than worth all the means, and that posterity will triumph, although you and I may rue, which I hope we shall not.

Four days later, the Liberty Bell rang out to summon the people to the first public reading of the document. As the words were read, there were great shouts of affirmation, and great celebration to follow. A year later, Congress would authorize the use of fireworks as an appropriate means of celebrating the birth of a new nation.

But amidst his feelings of enthusiasm, John Adams’ words above also reflected a somber tone that was common to all who signed the Declaration of Independence. In doing so, they knew they were inviting a declaration of war by England. They knew that, as traitors, they were essentially forfeiting all their possessions to the crown. Essentially, in signing the document, they were putting bounties on their own heads.

Their convictions

But in spite of the obvious cost, they considered the impact their actions would have for the people of America. They understood from Scripture that government is a sacred trust given by God to protect the inherent rights of people created in His image. Their new document stood toe-to-toe against the prevailing governmental idea of the day—the divine right of kings, which held that, when the one on the throne spoke, it was the voice of God speaking.

The Declaration of Independence contended that King George was abusing his God-given power as leader of England and the American colonies. It was their responsibility as decent men, they stated in their document, to challenge him on this for the sake of his subjects. Benjamin Franklin himself recommended a national motto in defense of their actions.

“Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.”

They listed King George’s offenses against the people and against his office—27 of them. The signers of the Declaration maintained that their continued efforts to bring their grievances before the king and his appointed  leaders had been met with indifference, if not oppression. They had no other recourse, they stated in the document, but to declare their independence from the tyrant who represented neither them nor the God who entrusted him with his position of leadership. They rejected his authority because King George had rejected His authority.

Their courage and sacrifice

Strong convictions often bring about strong consequences, especially when they oppose someone addicted to power. The British military had already been acting as though it was above the law; now it would be all-out war. Citizens who didn’t support the king would see suffering. They could expect to be imprisoned and have their property confiscated.

And those who led the effort to step up and break away from King George would face serious consequences: not just the vengeance of the British throne, but their unwavering commitment to the cause of freedom would come at high personal price as well. Consider the fate of a number of the signers of the Declaration of Independence.

George Walton of Georgia was wounded and captured in 1778 leading his state’s militia in the defense of his hometown of Savannah.

You might be interested in
In which of the following conflicts would the U.S. intervene according to the Powell Doctrine?
yulyashka [42]

B.  a country is harboring terrorists responsible for attacks on the U.S.

Explanation:

The Powell Doctrine is a term that is used for a policy that is primarily focused on defense of the country and preventing attacks on the country, usually by using military force. In order for a military attack to be approved though numerous things have to be taken in consideration, examined, and answered.

From the presented scenarios, the Powell Doctrine would enable the U.S. the intervene in a country is harboring terrorists responsible for attacks on the U.S. Such examples in the past few decades have been the war in Afghanistan because of Al-Qaeda, and the war in Iraq, also because of Al-Qaeda. A military intervention also occurred in Iraq and the neighboring Syria because of the rise of the terrorist organization ISIS among other reasons.

8 0
3 years ago
At the end of the hundred years' war, _______ was controlled by the english.
Tcecarenko [31]
The now U.S.  was controled by the English.
8 0
3 years ago
What were the two causes of the dark ages
Zolol [24]
The answer is dark age
4 0
3 years ago
What was the greatest failure of the reconstruction period?
galben [10]

Answer:

Explanation: The American Civil War preserved the Union and freed the slaves. However, during Reconstruction, a lack of political focus on the effort failed to solve the sectional wounds, and the elimination of the freed slaves' newly gained civil liberties failed to bring about long-term racial integration.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how were the economic affects of England’s constitutional monarchy different from those of the absolute monarchies of Spain and
Dominik [7]

Answer:

The monarchs of Spain and France were enormously wealthy, while those of England were on a par with the nobles.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • True or false:<br> Danes people are from France.
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the Sioux live in structures like those depicted in the image?
    9·2 answers
  • Who was the man that succeded Lincoln as president?
    6·1 answer
  • The beginnings of democracy were seen in the Greek city-state of RomeAthensSparta around 400
    6·2 answers
  • Who was the 1st president of USA?
    6·2 answers
  • How the the battle of hastings affect the course of english history
    9·2 answers
  • Read this quotation
    14·1 answer
  • What was a disadvantage for the colonists during the American Revolutionary War?
    7·1 answer
  • When was the was of 1885?
    6·2 answers
  • The cartoon below was created in the late 1800s:
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!