There are many important reasons why populations of highly developed countries decline. To number some, easy access to contraceptive method together with the a high level of female education makes birth control one important factor on population downward. Moreover, a stable economy improves lifestyle helping the population to choose professional careers thus focusing on different aspects but not making children.
On the other hand, it is important to mention that although the population in developed countries might be declining, the death rate is declining as well. As above mentioned, the lifestyle can be high and the aspects as shelter and a living space makes people healthier. Along with the economical growth comes the technological and health care advancement which greatly help the population of the developed countries to have easier and more affordable access to medical treatment making date rates lower.
It ended with the exchange of ratifications of the Treaty of Ghent. In 1812, with President Madison in office, Congress declared war against the British. The war began with an attack on Canada, both as an effort to gain land and to cut off British supply lines to Tecumseh's Indian confederation, which had long troubled the US.
Cortes did not believe in the actual existence of the Aztec Gods, but used these gods to his advantage when trying to convince the Aztecs that he was a god himself--thus tricking them into giving him their gold.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Roosevelt launched the new deal.
Answer:
The Declaration of Independence was issued “by authority of the good people of these colonies.” It was a revolution, you know.
The Pilgrims did not cite any specific authority for the Mayflower Compact. However, they declared themselves to be loyal subjects of the king of Great Britain. The Compact was based on their experience in organizing dissenting churches in England and, I suppose, in the Netherlands, where they had sought shelter from persecution. In some ways it was in keeping with the English common law, which dealt with problems and controversies as they arose, rather than waiting for the government to settle them. But in some ways it was a revolutionary, democratic statement, asserting the colonists’ right to make their own laws.
